July 5, 2022 – Washington County, WI – There have been a lot of new faces representing the 59th Assembly District in the last eight years and there have been a lot of strong candidates. The previous two representatives only served two terms before leaving office. We will soon be casting our ballots for another leader in our assembly district.
When I pick a candidate, I look for someone who is pro-life, pro-business, pro-medical freedom, pro-school choice and is someone who has governance and leadership experience. I pick someone who doesn’t need as much on the job training because we deserve to be strongly represented immediately when they are sworn in. I want someone who I can trust to stand up to the swamp in Madison and not compromise their beliefs.
That is why I am voting for Ty Bodden to be our next 59th district representative. He has the leadership ability and experience to go to Madison and get the job done right away. If you care about what is going on in our schools and about medical freedom, then Ty Bodden has a proven track record of facing those issues head on.
Ty, as the leader of the Calumet County Republican Party, helped run dozens of school board and county board races in his county this past spring, flipping seats liberal seats for conservatives. Word has gotten out that he led his county to win 80% of those races, supporting candidates that want to give parents control of what goes on in their child’s classroom.
That is proven leadership and that is what we need right now. This is not a time to take risks. This is such a crucial time in our history and Ty knows what he’s doing and will fight for us in Madison.
Please also note:
WCI COMMENTING RULES OF ETIQUETTE: While open and honest debate is encouraged here, Washington County Insider asks that you comply with the following rules for posting. Those who do not comply will have their posts removed and may result in being banned from commenting.
In an effort to provide a great experience and be welcoming to everyone, Washington County Insider will not publish comments and reserves the right to remove posts on social media/Facebook that doesn’t adhere to the guidelines below.
- Are considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others. This is known as “trolling.” Trollers know when they are trolling, and so do we. *See the definition of “troll” below. If you notice a few consistent blog trolls disappear, you’ll know why.
- Are sexually explicit, abusive, or otherwise objectionable.
- Contains inappropriate or vulgar language that is likely to offend.
- Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation, and contempt of court.
- Advertise products or services for profit.
- Are seen to impersonate someone else.
- Repeatedly post the same or similar messages (‘spam’)
- Include personal contact details such as telephone numbers and postal or email addresses.
- Include a link or photo that has not been approved by the editor prior to posting.
- Are considered campaigning. See also “trolling” above.
- Are unrelated to the topic.
- Just because your comment doesn’t show up right away doesn’t mean you’re being censored. When you post a comment it must first go through our filtering software. If it fails, your comment goes into a queue for manual approval.
- Just because a comment or advertisement is on the site, doesn’t mean WCI endorses it.
- The above rules are not intended to stop criticism or dissenters, but rather to stop those who are incapable of participating in a civilized manner.
*Trolling: a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion, often for the troll’s amusement. (source: Wikipedia)
Sorry Janet. But you can’t be pro-life and pro-medical freedom. The latter is all about having the autonomy to decide what is best for one’s self from a medical standpoint. Taking away a woman’s right to choose is anything but pro-medical freedom.