Key Logo job posting

Guest Editorial : What was the extraordinary session about? | By Rep. Rick Gundrum

Rick Gundrum banner


Dec. 15, 2018 – Washington Co., WI – I want to clarify what was accomplished in the extraordinary session and why I voted to accept the proposals.


The provisions I voted for are far from groundbreaking. Roughly half of the measures had been previously introduced as legislation, codified existing administrative rules, were part of recent state budget proposals, drew from settled case law, or aligned state law with changes to federal law.


In short, we ensured Governor-elect Evers does not undo what was already passed into law.  He did not run on overturning laws that already exist.


Governor-elect Evers will maintain the same Constitutional powers granted to Governor Walker. He continues to have one of the strongest veto pens in the nation. He will still be able to issue executive orders and appoint over 200 executive branch officials.


The Attorney General’s office has no powers specified in the state Constitution. The job of the Attorney General is to enforce and defend the laws that the legislature has passed. The Attorney General’s office continues to operate as it has in the past, which has always included legislative oversight as specified in the Wisconsin Constitution.


However, I am concerned with Governor-elect Evers indicating he wants to shut down the successful Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC). This agency plays a vital role in job creation and economic development. Over the past eight years, WEDC has awarded Washington County businesses over $9 million, and it is projected to create over 1,000 additional jobs. I voted to support the nine-month transition plan for WEDC to ensure current projects are completed throughout the state.


The statewide offices of Governor and Attorney General were elected by a mere 1-percent margin with the majority of the votes from Madison and Milwaukee districts. My election to the Assembly was a mandate from the voters of the 58th Assembly District.  I have not wavered from the positions I took prior to the election. I was clear about where I stood on the issues such as protecting the most vulnerable in society, defending our Second Amendment rights, funding all levels of education, maintaining local control, and holding the line on taxes.


Through conversations with my Republican colleagues in the Assembly and Senate, I sense a genuine willingness to work with Governor-elect Evers, Attorney General-elect Kaul, and our Democratic colleagues on issues we can find agreement on. I share that sentiment. Conflict and disagreement are inherent to our constitutional republic and democratic process. The first step, however, is making sure everyone has an equal seat at the table.


Governor Walker shared his approach to assessing the merits of each bill as they were signed into law stating: “My criteria when evaluating these bills were simple: Do they improve transparency? Do they increase accountability? Do they affirm stability? And do they protect the taxpayers? The answer is yes.”

Respectfully submitted,


Rick Gundrum

State Representative
58th Assembly District



Disclaimer: Opinions and letters published in are not necessarily the views of the Editor, or Publisher. The reserves the right to edit or omit copy, in accordance with newspaper policies. Letters to the Editor must be attributed with a name, address and contact phone number – names and town of origin will be printed, or may be withheld at the Editor’s discretion. During the course of any election campaign, letters to the editor dealing with election issues or similar material must contain the author’s name and street address (not PO Box) for publication.

London : W. Foulsham & Co., [1918]


While open and honest debate is encouraged here, Washington County Insider asks that you comply with the following rules for posting. Those who do not comply will have their posts removed and may result in being banned from commenting.

Washington County Insider will not publish comments that:

  • Are considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others. This is known as “trolling.” Trollers know when they are trolling, and so do we. *See definition of “troll” below. If you notice a few consistent blog trolls disappear, you’ll know why.
  • Are sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable.
  • Contains inappropriate or vulgar language that is likely to offend.
  • Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation and contempt of court.
  • Advertise products or services for profit.
  • Are seen to impersonate someone else.
  • Repeatedly post the same or similar messages (‘spam’)
  • Include personal contact details such as telephone numbers and postal or email addresses.
  • Include a link or photo that has not been approved by the editor prior to posting.
  • Are considered campaigning. See also “trolling” above.
  • Are unrelated to the topic.


  • Just because your comment doesn’t show up right away doesn’t mean you’re being censored. When you post a comment it must first go through our filtering software. If it fails, your comment goes into a queue for manual approval.
  • Just because a comment or advertisement is on the site, doesn’t mean WCI endorses it.
  • The above rules are not intended to stop criticism or dissenters, but rather to stop those who are incapable of participating in a civilized manner.


*Trolling: troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement. (source: Wikipedia)

Graphic courtesy Owego Pennysaver Press

  1. Posted by Curt Casetta
  2. Posted by Kris

Add Your Comment

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :
%d bloggers like this: