March 9, 2023 – Germantown, Wi – Liberal PAC money pouring into Wisconsin to support Janet Protasiewicz and demonize Daniel Kelly for Supreme Court should give everyone pause. Presumably the PACs are promoting a woman who supports “the law” and “abortion rights.” But there are problems with that.
Protasiewicz has not said word-one about upholding our Constitution, the foremost job of a Justice. Rather than campaigning on how she’ll vote on ANY issue, she should confirm she’ll carefully review the constitutionality of all legislation brought before the court.
She believes that abortion is an important women’s health issue, yet liberals have total disregard for women by allowing transgender men in women’s locker rooms, bathrooms, sports, etc. Furthermore, liberals are unable to define a woman, and claim men can get pregnant. So how can ONE female issue be important when all others are not?
Per Pew Research, only 1.44% of women between the ages of 15 and 44 get abortions. That suggests an abortion “yes” vote is not what big-money PACs are buying. Abortion is the “dog whistle,” riling up voters into believing democracy and their rights are in peril.
It is Protasiewicz’s “no” votes PACs are buying – “nos” that will impact the entire state, including “no” to Voter ID, School Choice, Act 10, Right to Work, Parental Rights, cash bail, election integrity legislation, school curriculum transparency, and much more.
Daniel Kelly does not promise how he will vote on issues not yet before the court. He has repeatedly made his position clear — he will vote to uphold our Constitution – and that is exactly the job that is on the ballot.
So, on April 4, tell big-money, outside PACs that Wisconsin, our Constitution and our integrity are not for sale! Vote for Daniel Kelly for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Jean L Merry
Germantown
Please also note:
COMMENTING
WASHINGTONCOUNTYINSIDER.COM (WCI) COMMENTING RULES OF ETIQUETTE: While open and honest debate is encouraged here, Washington County Insider asks that you comply with the following rules for posting. Those who do not comply will have their posts removed and may result in being banned from commenting.
In an effort to provide a great experience and be welcoming to everyone, Washington County Insider will not publish comments and reserves the right to remove posts on social media/Facebook that doesn’t adhere to the guidelines below.
-
- Are considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others. This is known as “trolling.” Trollers know when they are trolling, and so do we. *See the definition of “troll” below. If you notice a few consistent blog trolls disappear, you’ll know why.
- Are sexually explicit, abusive, or otherwise objectionable.
- Contains inappropriate or vulgar language that is likely to offend.
-
- Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation, and contempt of court.
- Advertise products or services for profit.
- Are seen impersonating someone else.
-
- Repeatedly post the same or similar messages (‘spam’)
- Include personal contact details such as telephone numbers and postal or email addresses.
- Include a link or photo that has not been approved by the editor prior to posting.
- Are considered campaigning. See also “trolling” above.
- Are unrelated to the topic.
NOTES:
-
- Just because your comment doesn’t show up right away doesn’t mean you’re being censored. When you post a comment it must first go through our filtering software. If it fails, your comment goes into a queue for manual approval.
- Just because a comment or advertisement is on the site, doesn’t mean WCI endorses it.
- The above rules are not intended to stop criticism or dissenters, but rather to stop those who are incapable of participating in a civilized manner.
*Trolling: a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement. (source: Wikipedia)